Comparison · Photta vs FASHN
Photta vs FASHN — AI fashion API, side by side
Both are credit-based fashion AI APIs. FASHN ships more secondary tools (video, face-to-model, product-to-model); Photta's three endpoints go deeper on apparel, jewelry and ghost mannequin, with per-call credit costs published up front. Every number on this page was pulled directly from FASHN's pricing page on 2026-04-19.
In one sentence
Photta ships three endpoints (apparel try-on, jewelry try-on, ghost mannequin) with transparent per-call credit costs (5 / 7 / 4). FASHN ships a wider tool surface (video, face-to-model, product-to-model) on explicit monthly plans at $19 / $49 / $99 with 200–1,500 credits plus daily refills. Pick Photta if you want jewelry and ghost mannequin in one account with clearly-priced REST calls. Pick FASHN if you need image-to-video or face-to-model and can absorb a subscription.
Pricing data as of · 2026-04-19
Feature matrix
Every row, side by side
No selective omissions. Where FASHN wins, we say so. Where a number isn't public, we say 'not published' instead of inventing one.
| Feature | Photta | FASHN |
|---|---|---|
| Apparel virtual try-on | Yes | Yes |
| Jewelry try-on endpoint | Yes | No |
| Ghost-mannequin endpoint | Yes | No |
| Product-to-model transform | No | Yes |
| Face-to-model endpoint | No | Yes |
| Custom AI mannequin creation | Yes | Yes |
| Image-to-video endpoint | No | Yes |
| Background removal | Yes | Yes |
| Official language SDK | No | No |
| Integration pattern | Async + poll | Async + poll |
| Trial credits at signup | Included with signup | 10 credits |
| Entry plan | Photta consumer plans | $19 / mo (200 credits) |
| Mid-tier plan | Photta consumer plans | $49 / mo (750 + 50 daily) |
| Top published tier | Photta consumer plans | $99 / mo (1,500 + 100 daily) |
| Credit top-up rate | Bundled in consumer credit packs | $0.10 per credit (100 min) |
| Concurrent generations | Not published | 3 / 6 / 11 by tier |
| Disclosed per-call credit cost | 5 credits (2K) / 7 (4K) / 4 (ghost 2K) | Varies by tool + resolution; not disclosed on pricing page |
Sources: fashn.ai/pricing, help.fashn.ai/plans-and-pricing/api-pricing, docs.fashn.ai. Pulled 2026-04-19.
Where Photta leads
Why developers pick Photta
- Jewelry try-on ships as a first-class endpoint with purpose-built close-up mannequins — not a retrofitted apparel model.
- Ghost mannequin exposes a dedicated batch endpoint for catalog-scale runs (hundreds of items per call).
- Every endpoint has a published per-call credit cost (5 at 2K, 7 at 4K, 4 for ghost). No guessing per request.
- One Photta account covers every endpoint. You don't juggle separate credit pools for try-on vs other tools.
Where FASHN leads
Why developers pick FASHN
- FASHN's API catalog includes image-to-video, which Photta doesn't currently expose.
- Pro and Agency plans add daily credit refills on top of the monthly allowance, smoothing out burst usage.
- Agency tier grants 11 concurrent generations — useful for bulk catalog runs.
- FASHN ships product-to-model, face-to-model, reframe, background-remove and edit as distinct endpoints.
Pick Photta if
You need jewelry, ghost mannequin and predictable per-call costs
Photta's three endpoints cover the on-model, close-up jewelry and invisible-mannequin use cases in one account. Per-call credits are published up front (5 at 2K, 7 at 4K, 4 for ghost), and every plan dollar flows through Photta's existing consumer subscription — no separate API plan to manage.
Pick FASHN if
You need a wider tool surface or image-to-video
FASHN's developer API covers video generation, face-to-model, product-to-model and a reframe endpoint that Photta doesn't ship today. If those endpoints are load-bearing for your product, FASHN's monthly plans ($19 / $49 / $99) with daily credit refills are the simpler choice.
Questions other developers ask
Questions before you commit
Which should I pick, FASHN or Photta?+
If your product needs jewelry try-on or ghost mannequin as a first-class endpoint, Photta is the better fit — FASHN's public API doesn't expose those. If you need image-to-video or face-to-model and are fine subscribing to a monthly plan, FASHN gives you more distinct endpoints in one account.
Is FASHN more expensive than Photta?+
It depends on volume. FASHN's Basic plan is $19/month for 200 credits ($0.095 effective per credit). Photta bundles API credits into the consumer subscription without a separate API tier — so the apples-to-apples comparison is your monthly spend × credits used, not the sticker price of a standalone API plan.
Does FASHN have a jewelry try-on endpoint?+
As of 2026-04-19, FASHN's public API catalog doesn't list a dedicated jewelry try-on endpoint. Their product page groups jewelry under the virtual try-on umbrella. Photta exposes jewelry as a distinct endpoint (`/api/v1/tryon/jewelry`) with purpose-built close-up mannequins.
Can I migrate from FASHN to Photta easily?+
The request shapes are different — FASHN's virtual try-on takes a garment + model image pair, Photta's takes a product + mannequin ID + pose ID. The polling pattern is similar enough that the rest of your integration stack (queue, database, UI) stays the same. Plan on a half-day port per endpoint you use.
Comparison · Photta vs FASHN
Try Photta before you commit to a yearly FASHN plan
Trial credits come with every Photta account. Paste the cURL snippet from the virtual try-on page and you'll have your first image in five minutes.